
Abuse
Verb [abused; abusing]
- to put to a wrong or improper use
- to use excessively
- injure or damage
- to attack in words[1]
To retrieve these definitions from useful resources buried under terabytes of TikTok videos in internet’s memory, I had to Bing ‘abuse’ (Bing is a Microsoft-powered search engine; remarkably slower than Google). Thereon, I had to sift through loads of definitions to find the most concise ones. An interesting feature on search engines these days is that it has turned highly visual compared to internet’s initial textual days. Inevitably, I came across images of women bruised and hurt with taglines reporting abuse. Trauma is serious injuries on the body, etc. Is abuse somehow related to trauma?
Trauma is an event, a life-centric occurrence. Abuse (verb) is an action of maltreatment. When this maltreatment becomes life-centric, it causes trauma. All the women in those pictures reflected signs of trauma on their faces. And while I do not deny the veracity of any of those pictures as an example, why is it that all the examples had to have faces of a woman? Did I somehow venture into a territory of patriarchy which denies the existence of men’s vulnerabilities? Is abuse a part of such territory?

I do not know of a single occasion where the topic of men’s abuse was raised and it was not compared to women’s abuse. Whenever the topic is raised, it is mostly raised by some misogynist man trying to undermine or refute a feminist’s rightful claims of systemic abuse worldwide and through the centuries of females by males. On the flip-side of the coin, it also happens that whenever the topic is raised, many immature feminists (including I, once upon a time) start blabbing about how women’s abuse is this and that, systemic and higher in number, etc. However, that is not supposed to be the topic. It is not realised that women’s abuse is systemic and men’s is not. This makes it imperative that both kinds of abuse are approached in widely different methods. If men’s abuse by women is not systemic, the discussion of neither women’s so-called ‘abusive’ tendencies nor women’s systemic oppression should take place. Such grossly misplaced dialogues are vulgar and are extremely disrespectful to male survivors of abuse.

The frightening consequences of the lack of knowledge and acceptance of male trauma can be assessed in the life of Earl Silverman of Calgary, Canada. Earl was a domestic abuse survivor. He had escaped his violent wife back in 1991 only to find that the Canadian government had no abuse shelters dedicated to heterosexual men.[2] He was also ridiculed by the police for being a male victim of female abuse. The only publicly funded service available for him for a man was for anger management. This heavily re-victimised Earl who got the following message from the attitude of the government:
“As a victim, I was re-victimized by having these services telling me that I wasn’t a victim, but I was a perpetrator.”

Earl Silverman opened a victim’s helpline, lobbied politicians and campaigned for better services, and eventually succeeded in opening the Men’s Alternative Safe House.[3] He funded the shelter home out of his pocket too. And while all of this sounds sweet, due to ridicule and lack of financial support from the Canadian government for the abuse shelter he had established in his own home, Earl was forced to close the shelter home. He ultimately committed suicide in 2013. All his life, Earl had fought against how domestic violence had come to be rigidly regarded as a women’s issue.
Earl’s death fueled misogynists to misappropriate his stance and blame feminists as his real perpetrators. Even today, we hear misguided phrases such as “men are abused more than women,” “men do not speak due to feminism,” and, “men are more vulnerable to biases than women, the world is crueler to men.” These claims are neither supported by statistics nor any research but do much to shift the conversation towards the social dynamic between men and women while totally ignoring it again that men’s abuse by women is not institutional and such distortion of the issue removes the spotlight from the issue at hand ie. men consistently being abused as we speak.
As such, while I do understand that environmentalists focus on the environment and vegetarians focus on animal cruelty, I propose that feminists start taking up men’s rights along with women’s rights. Since male victim rights are demolished due to the same patriarchy that systemically abuses women, it would only benefit the whole of humanity that abuse of men is recognised as real and existent abuse. Misogynists must not given the opportunity to convert the issue of men’s rights into a misogynist propaganda and misinformed feminists must be made aware that they do not get to erase abused men from the narrative on abuse just because abuse of men is not institutional. Abuse is abuse. It is high time that male victims of abuse are not reduced to a controversial topic. Men deserve better than that.
Every victim of trauma deserves better than that.

P.S. – The words ‘male’ and ‘men’ have been used interchangeably because the post above was regarding domestic abuse of cisgender men in heterosexual relationships.
[1] Abuse – Defined at Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Merriam-Webster, Incorporated. 2013 [Word first used in 15th century]. Retrieved 28 December 2013.
[2] “Man who ran Canada’s only shelter dedicated solely to male victims of domestic abuse dies in apparent suicide”. National Post. Retrieved 2020-08-31.
[3] “Need knows no gender”. The Independent. 2013-05-01. Retrieved 2020-08-31.
Male rape and sexual abuse is a largely hidden crisis. It’s time to give them support.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Abuse is Abuse no matter who the victim is.🙌🏻 And you’re absolutely right, Feminism is not just about fighting for women’s rights.. It’s high time that male victims of abuse and trauma are allowed to speak up without having the fear of being shamed by their peers. Gender is not the base criteria for deciding whether you are a victim. We must change this erroneous perception of the people.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with everything except that feminism IS just about fighting women’s rights and equalising those to men’s by removing the patriarchy. However, because the main motto of feminism is to disintegrate institutions of patriarchy and its mechanisms, and because abused men form a part of patriarchy’s victims since people don’t believe them, feminism could also adopt abused men’s cause. Male victims do not have many places to go and unionise under. I proposed feminists to adopt their cause too.
LikeLike
Agreed. I simply meant it in the way that… Feminism is about men and women being equals. So the way I see it, Feminism is for every single person who is oppressed by the patriarchy in any way. For it is those same men in power that refuse us our rights, who make male victims of abuse feel ashamed and unheard.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Perfectly written 👍🏻🙌
LikeLiked by 1 person